In short

An insurance claim on a civil job is a records exercise. Make safe, then preserve the scene; never admit liability, agree a cost or remediate before it is recorded; notify every policy that might respond the same day; and run the contractual notice clock and the insurance clock separately. The evidence that decides the claim was created before the incident.

The operator feels it before anyone sees it — a dull catch through the stick, then water coming up through the trench faster than the pump can shift it. Not groundwater. Mains water. Inside twenty minutes the street is closed and the basement next door is taking on more than anyone wants to think about. Somebody says the four words that start most of the damage that follows: just claim it, mate.

The next two days decide whether the policy responds and what your insurance costs for the next three years. Making an insurance claim is a records exercise conducted under time pressure, and the people who do it well were keeping the records before anything went wrong.

This guide covers what happens after an incident. Which covers to buy, what limits to carry and how to price cover into a bid sit in our guide to insurance requirements for government civil tenders. From here we assume you have the cover.

The first forty-eight hours

Two things happen in this window, in strict order: make it safe, then preserve it. Nothing displaces the first. If people are at risk, a service is live or something is escaping to a drain, deal with that before you think about a photograph. Theft and malicious damage claims have their own sequence, set out in our guide to plant theft and site security.

Once the site is stable, the scene in front of you is the best evidence that will ever exist, and it has a very short life. Traffic wants the road back, the asset owner wants to repair its main, the principal wants the works moving. Every one of those pressures destroys evidence, and every one is legitimate.

The three instincts that cost you money

  1. Admitting liability. Almost every liability policy conditions cover on your not admitting liability or settling without consent, because the insurer runs the defence. Giving the defence away before the insurer has seen the file is the clearest prejudice there is.
  2. Agreeing to pay. The neighbour wants their wall fixed, so you agree a number or send your own crew. You have settled a third-party claim on terms your insurer did not set, at a price nobody tested.
  3. Remediating in a way that destroys the evidence. The strike is backfilled before anyone photographs the service against the marks; the damaged pipe goes in the bin. Each removes the thing that would have proved your case.

None of this means being unhelpful. Cooperating is not admitting, and expressing regret is not accepting legal responsibility. What you must not do is characterise fault, agree a cost, or dispose of evidence.

Then preserve. Photograph wide, medium and close, with locate marks, pegs and plans visible in frame. Tag and store the damaged part rather than letting it go to the tip with the spoil. Take individual written accounts the same day, before recollections converge.

Assume every message you send about this incident will be read in full by an adjuster, a lawyer and the principal. Write facts, not theories. “Bucket contacted an unmarked service at chainage 42, 900mm depth, 10:15” is a fact. “We must have gone in too hard” is a theory, and it will be quoted back at you for two years.

Notifying your insurer, and why late notice costs you

Policies require notice of an incident, loss or claim as soon as reasonably practicable — some wordings say immediately, some set out a process. Your wording governs, and it is worth knowing what yours says before you need it rather than reading it in the ute at seven at night.

Late notification is the commonest reason cover is reduced or refused on civil jobs. Not exclusions, not non-disclosure. Delay. A contractor waits to see whether the third party complains, and by the time notification is made the scene is gone, the third party has lawyers, and the insurer has lost every chance it had to investigate or control the cost. Insurance notification also runs in parallel with statutory notification duties, which have their own deadlines — see our guide to incident notification and investigation.

There is a statutory protection and it goes less far than contractors think. Under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), where an insurer would be entitled to refuse a claim because of something the insured did or failed to do after the contract was entered into — such as notifying late — it generally cannot refuse by reason only of that act. Its liability is instead reduced by the amount that fairly represents the extent to which its interests were prejudiced.

That is not a safety net. It converts a refusal into an argument about how much of the claim you lose, and the delay has destroyed the evidence you would need to win it. Prejudice looks like this: the site rebuilt so cause cannot be established; the damaged component binned; witnesses gone; a recovery against a subcontractor now unprovable.

What goes in the first notification

Notify in writing through your broker and keep a copy. A phone call is a fine first step but it is not the record. The notification need not be complete — it needs to be prompt and truthful about what you know.

  • When and where — date, time, project, location, chainage, contract number.
  • What happened, factually, with an express note of what is not yet known.
  • Who is involved — your people, subcontractors, the principal, the asset owner, third parties, anyone injured.
  • What is damaged, distinguishing your works, your plant, third-party property and existing structures.
  • What you have done to make safe, what you have preserved, and who else has been notified.
  • The contract — its indemnity and insurance provisions shape what the insurer is dealing with.

One instruction saves more claims than any other: notify under every policy that might respond, not just the one you think responds. Notifying two insurers when only one answers costs nothing. Notifying the wrong one, and only the wrong one, can cost you the claim.

Notify on suspicion, not on certainty

Most liability and professional indemnity wordings allow — and generally require — you to notify a circumstance: facts that might give rise to a claim, though no claim has been made and might never be. A neighbour says their floor cracked since you started piling. A superintendent asks, in an otherwise ordinary email, whether your set-out levels were checked. Neither is a claim. Both are notifiable, and both can become claims eighteen months later.

This matters most on claims-made policies, which respond to claims made against you during the policy period rather than to work done during it. Professional indemnity is the usual example, and design-and-construct work, temporary works design and any advice you give all sit there.

Under the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), where you give written notice of facts that might give rise to a claim, as soon as reasonably practicable after becoming aware of them and before cover expires, the insurer is not relieved of liability merely because the claim itself is made after the policy period ends. So an unnotified circumstance that surfaces two years later, after the policy that should have responded has expired, is an uninsured loss.

That protection carries a condition contractors get wrong. The notification must be of facts, with enough particularity to identify what might be coming. Australian courts have made clear that a bare possibility, or a blanket sweep-everything notification lodged in the last week of the policy period, does not do the work. Vagueness is not caution — it is a notification that fails when you need it.

The two clocks

If you take one thing from this guide, take this. From the moment the damage occurs, two separate notice obligations run at the same time, to different recipients, on different time bars, in different words, with different consequences for missing them. Satisfying one does not satisfy the other.

The contract clockThe insurance clock
Who you notifyThe superintendent or principal, in the manner the contract specifiesYour insurer, normally through your broker
What triggers itDamage to the works or to property, delay, a direction, a latent condition, a claim for time or moneyAn occurrence, loss, claim, or a circumstance that might give rise to a claim
The wordingA specific number of days, often running from when you became aware“As soon as reasonably practicable”, or as your wording states
What missing it costsWhere the notice is a condition precedent, the entitlement itself — regardless of the meritsCover reduced to the extent the insurer is prejudiced, and in some cases refused
Can the other save youNo. The insurer is not a party to your contractNo. The superintendent is not your insurer’s agent

The contract clock is usually the sharper. Standard construction contracts impose short notice periods for events causing delay or additional cost, frequently as conditions precedent — miss the notice and the entitlement is extinguished however strong the underlying claim. That machinery is set out in our guides to contract administration for civil SMEs and extension of time and delay claims.

Watch the overlap. If the superintendent directs you to carry out remediation, that direction is capable of being a variation with its own notice requirements and valuation — see variations in civil construction contracts. Do the work because it feels like your mess and you can perform a variation for nothing and prejudice a claim in the same afternoon.

The habit that fixes this permanently is an incident register: one row per incident, one column for every notice that might be required — superintendent, principal, asset owner, insurer, broker, regulator, subcontractor. Each cell holds the date sent and the sender, or “not required” with a one-line reason.

Who else you have to tell, and in what order

Order matters, because the first hour has room for about three phone calls and the wrong three make everything harder.

  1. Emergency services, where there is injury, fire, escaping gas, electrical contact or a threat to the public.
  2. The asset owner, for any service strike, immediately. Only they can isolate, and their emergency number is on the plans that should already be on site.
  3. Your own management, so one person coordinates and one version of the facts is recorded.
  4. The superintendent or principal, in the manner the contract requires, in writing, the same day.
  5. Your broker, the same day. Do not wait for a cost estimate.
  6. The regulator, where the incident falls into a category that must be notified.

On regulators, work from the requirement rather than from memory. Work health and safety legislation in every Australian jurisdiction requires certain incidents — deaths, serious injuries and defined dangerous incidents such as uncontrolled escapes of substances, electrical contact and structural collapse — to be notified to the WHS regulator immediately, with the site preserved until the regulator directs otherwise. Environmental legislation imposes separate duties for pollution incidents. Categories and recipients differ by state and territory, so confirm them for your jurisdiction and build the answer into your incident procedure.

With third parties, give the affected owner your company details and, once you have it, the claim number and your insurer’s contact. Then stop. Do not inspect their property and opine on the damage, agree a scope of repair, or accept their quote. Every additional sentence is one somebody will characterise later.

What happens after you notify

  • Acknowledgement and a claim number. Everything from here goes under that number.
  • Triage — damage to your own works, a third-party liability matter, or both. That determines which wording is applied.
  • Appointment of a loss adjuster on anything beyond the trivial.
  • A reserve is set — an internal estimate of what the claim will cost the insurer, including investigation and defence. Not a payment and not an admission, but it matters to you for the reason in section 14.
  • Scope of loss — what is damaged and what it costs to put right, usually on independent quotations rather than yours.
  • Liability determination on a liability claim: whether you are legally liable. A different question from whether you caused the damage, and a very different one from whether you feel responsible.
  • Reservation of rights. The insurer may investigate while expressly reserving its position on cover. Standard practice, not a denial.
  • Settlement or defence. The insurer typically has the right to conduct the defence and settle — the flip side of the condition preventing you from settling yourself.

Most Australian general insurers subscribe to the General Insurance Code of Practice, administered by the Insurance Council of Australia, which sets standards and timeframes for how claims are handled and how you are kept informed. Compliance is monitored by an independent Code Governance Committee. The Code has been rewritten and consulted on, so check which version applies to your policy.

One thing nobody warns you about: between the incident and any payment, you spend money. Emergency response, traffic management, standing time, the excess, often the first tranche of remediation. On a liability claim you may spend all of that and receive nothing directly, because the payment goes to the third party. Absorbing that without distress is part of what principals test when they examine your balance sheet, per demonstrating financial capacity in tenders.

The loss adjuster, and how to be useful to one

A loss adjuster is engaged by the insurer to establish what happened, whether the policy responds and what the loss is worth. They are not your adversary and not your advocate. Treating them as either is a mistake — the first makes you obstructive, the second makes you careless.

They work through four questions: what happened, established from records rather than anybody’s account; whether the policy responds; what the loss is worth; and whether somebody else should be paying — a subcontractor, a supplier, a designer, an asset owner whose records were wrong.

  • Nominate one point of contact. An adjuster ringing three people and getting three versions is the worst outcome available to you.
  • Deliver a pack, not a drip. One indexed bundle beats fourteen emails over five weeks, and it signals a business with its records in order.
  • Answer with records, not opinions. “The referral response is at tab 4, the potholing record at tab 6” — not “we always pothole”.
  • Do not coach your people. Coached accounts are obvious and they contaminate everything else you have said.
  • Correct errors promptly and in writing. Errors are survivable; discovered errors you sat on are not.

One failure mode outranks all others: contradiction. The diary says the trench was open Tuesday, the docket says the excavator was on another job, the SWMS names a control nobody used, and the operator says something different again. Together these invite the adjuster to disbelieve everything, and a claim assessed by someone who does not trust your records is one you will argue about for a year. If the claim is large or looks likely to be disputed, ask your broker whether you should engage your own adjuster or a lawyer.

The evidence is made before the incident

The records that determine an insurance claim on a civil job are almost entirely records you either were or were not keeping in the ordinary course of the work, weeks before anything went wrong. You cannot create them afterwards, and any attempt to do so is both obvious and fatal.

RecordWhat it provesHow it fails
Site diarySequence of work, who was on site, weather, instructions, delaysWritten up weekly from memory, or stopped three months ago
Daily records and docketsPlant and labour on site, hours, quantities, what each machine was doingUnsigned, undated, or reconciled to the invoice rather than the day
Referral response and asset plansThat you asked before you dug, and what you were toldExpired before the excavation, or covering only some assets present
Locating and potholing recordsThat you physically proved position and depthThe proving was done but never recorded — so on the file it did not happen
SWMS with signed acknowledgementsThe hazard was identified, a control specified, the crew briefedGeneric template with no site content, or unsigned by the people doing the work
Inductions, competencies, pre-startsThe operator was ticketed and current, and the machine was fit for useExpired tickets, or a month of pre-starts completed in one sitting
Dilapidation surveyThe condition of adjacent structures before you startedNot done at all — the commonest and costliest omission on constrained sites
Subcontractor certificate of currencyThat another party’s policy is available to respondCollected once at engagement and never refreshed when it lapsed

Dilapidation surveys deserve emphasis. Before working adjacent to anything you did not build, photograph and record its condition with dates, in a form you can produce two years later. When the owner says the crack appeared while you were vibrating, the survey either answers them in ten minutes or you spend six months establishing something you could have proved in an afternoon.

So does the safe work method statement. One that names the hazard, specifies the control and carries the signatures of the crew briefed on it is evidence you identified the risk and managed it. A generic document downloaded and never adapted is evidence of the opposite, and an adjuster reads it that way — see writing a WHS management plan and SWMS for civil tenders. The document that wins the tender is the document that defends the claim.

A contractor with disciplined project records has a fundamentally different insurance experience from one without. The same records carry your contractual claims, which is why the systems in contract administration for civil SMEs pay for themselves twice.

The excess and the arithmetic of small claims

Every claim carries an excess — the amount you bear before the insurer pays anything. Excesses vary by policy section and are frequently higher for particular perils, so the number you remember from the schedule may not be the number that applies here.

The excess is the visible cost. The invisible ones are larger: days of unbilled management attention, and a permanent line in your claims experience that is disclosed at every renewal and answered in every prequalification questionnaire that asks. Frequency reads worse to an underwriter than severity, so a run of modest claims can cost more over three years than one substantial loss. The same logic runs through workers compensation, where claim duration rather than claim count drives the cost — see our guide to workers compensation and injury management.

Hence the arithmetic. A loss close to the excess returns very little and buys a permanent entry on the record. A loss well above it is exactly what the policy is for, and declining to claim in the hope of a better renewal is a bad trade dressed up as prudence.

The distinction that resolves this: you may choose not to claim; you should almost never choose not to notify. Notification preserves your position. It costs nothing, starts no payment, and removes the late-notice problem entirely. Claiming spends the policy. Two decisions, two different times, and the second can usually wait until you know what the loss is.

Two qualifications. Where a third party is involved, notify regardless — you do not control whether they claim against you, and they may do nothing for a year then send a letter of demand. And settle your threshold with your broker before an incident, so the decision at 5pm on the day is a policy the business already has.

Service strikes: the commonest civil claim

If you dig for a living, this is the claim you will make. Water, sewer, gas, electrical, telecommunications, fibre and signal cabling — all of it is in the ground, some of it is not where the plan says, and a proportion is on no plan at all.

The question that decides the claim is almost never “did you hit it”. You hit it; there is a photograph. The question is whether you proved where it was and followed the conditions the asset owner set for working near it. That is answered by a chain of records, and the chain is either complete or it is not.

  1. A current referral through Before You Dig Australia — the national service formerly known as Dial Before You Dig, which merged the state entities into one national organisation. The referral is the request; it is not the answer.
  2. Plans returned by each asset owner. Each registered owner responds separately with its own plans and conditions. You need all the responses, not the first that arrived.
  3. Currency. Responses have a validity period. A referral obtained at tender and used months later is not a defence — it is an admission that you dug on stale information.
  4. Plans and conditions on site, in the hands of the people digging, not in a folder in the office.
  5. Locating and physical proving — potholing or non-destructive excavation to establish actual position and depth before mechanical excavation approaches the asset, and a record that it was done.
  6. Excavation method matched to the zone. Owners specify no-go distances and permitted methods. Machine excavation inside a hand-digging zone ends most arguments.

Every asset owner sets its own conditions, and those conditions — not general practice, not what you did last time — are the specification for the excavation. The chain breaks in predictable places: the referral expired; three owners responded and only two were reviewed; proving was carried out but never recorded; the service was found in a different position and nobody told the next shift; or the excavation was subcontracted and the subcontractor never saw the conditions.

At the moment of the strike

  • Stop and withdraw people. Treat every strike as live and hazardous until the asset owner says otherwise.
  • Call the asset owner’s emergency number. Only they can isolate, and you never attempt a repair on someone else’s asset.
  • If it is safe, leave the machine and the excavation as they are until photographed, with locate marks, pegs, plan and a scale visible in frame.
  • Record the depth, the offset from the mark and the cover over the asset. Those three numbers decide a large proportion of service strike claims.
  • Ask whether you may retain the damaged section once cut out. If you do not ask, you never will.
  • Pass the repair scope and cost to your insurer when it comes, without comment.

Where the service sat in a position no plan showed and no reasonable locating would have found, you are in a different argument — the same one you would run under the contract as a latent condition. These are parallel tracks, not alternatives. The claim against the principal for time and cost, and the notification to your liability insurer about the third-party damage, are both live at once. That is the two clocks again, in its most common form.

Understand the shape of the loss, too. The asset owner’s repair invoice is often the smallest part of it. Loss of supply, emergency response, traffic management and consequential losses to affected customers can dwarf the physical repair, which is why third-party exposure on utility work differs in kind from general roadworks — see water and sewer pipeline tenders.

Three covers, three different claims

One incident frequently produces damage in three categories, and those go to different policies — or different sections of the same policy — with different excesses, limits and exclusions. Mis-categorising at notification delays everything and occasionally loses cover altogether.

What was damagedWhere it normally sitsThe trap
The permanent works, before handoverContract worksCover typically ends at practical completion, with a different position during the defects liability period
Your plant, equipment and hired-in gearPlant and equipment coverHired-in plant may also sit under the hire agreement’s own terms
Third-party property — a neighbour’s wall, a parked car, a utility mainPublic liabilityResponds to legal liability, not to the fact of damage
The principal’s existing structure you are working on or next toOften excluded from public liability as property in your care, custody or controlNeeds a specific extension, or an existing-structures section. The most common gap
Injury to your own workerThe workers compensation scheme in that state or territorySeparate scheme, separate notification, separate clock — not a liability claim
A design, certification or advice failureProfessional indemnity, claims-madeNotify the circumstance in the policy year you learn of it — see section 3
Rectifying your own defective workFrequently excluded or limitedThe cost of redoing bad work and the damage it caused are treated differently

That last row surprises contractors. Insurance is not a warranty on your workmanship. Where a joint you made fails, remaking the joint is generally your problem; the resulting damage to someone else’s property may be a different matter depending on the wording. Damage during the defects liability period also sits in a different place from damage during construction, as set out in practical completion, defects liability and the final claim.

So do not categorise it yourself. Describe what happened and what was damaged, notify everything that might respond, and let your broker and the insurers work out which policy answers. You are not paid to be an underwriter, and getting it wrong has an asymmetric cost.

When the insurer says no

Distinguish three things that all get called a denial. A reservation of rights means the insurer will investigate but is not committing on cover — a hold, not a decision. Partial acceptance means the third-party damage is covered but rectification of your own work is not, or liability is accepted and quantum disputed; most disputes are actually here. Declinature is a decision that the policy does not respond.

The common grounds are an exclusion applying, a condition breached, non-disclosure at inception or renewal, the work falling outside the business activities described in the schedule, or no legal liability established. Business activities catches contractors who diversify — you were insured for civil construction and the incident happened while you were doing demolition, or working over water. Tell your broker when your work changes, not at renewal. No legal liability catches everyone once: a liability policy pays what you are legally liable to pay, so where you are not legally liable the insurer does not pay, even though the third party is out of pocket.

The escalation path

  1. Get the decision in writing, identifying the policy provision relied on and the facts said to engage it. A decision whose reasoning you cannot see is one you cannot answer.
  2. Answer it with evidence. Many declinatures rest on an incomplete factual picture, and supplying the missing record resolves them with no formal process at all.
  3. Internal dispute resolution. Insurers must operate an internal complaints process meeting standards set by ASIC. A declined claim, and a dispute about the value of a claim, are among the matters where you are entitled to a written response setting out the outcome and the reasons.
  4. External dispute resolution. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) considers complaints from consumers and small businesses about general insurance, including denied claims, the value of an assessed loss and delays in deciding. It is free to complainants and its determinations bind the financial firm if you accept them. Eligibility criteria and monetary limits apply and are revised from time to time — check the current position with AFCA directly.
  5. Legal proceedings. Available, expensive, and something to take advice on well before you get there.

Get advice early on anything substantial. Whether an exclusion applies, whether a breach caused relevant prejudice, and whether the statutory protections in the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth) assist you all depend on the wording and the facts. Your broker should be doing the first round of this work as a matter of course. A broker who goes quiet when a claim is declined has told you something useful about who to place your account with next year.

One warning while a dispute runs: the job does not pause. Your obligation to progress the works continues, and so does your entitlement to be paid for work properly performed. Do not let a disputed claim become a reason to stop issuing payment claims or to leave a payment schedule unanswered — that statutory machinery has its own short timeframes, as set out in security of payment in Australia.

When the incident is your subcontractor’s

The excavator that hit the main belongs to a subcontractor. Everyone on site relaxes slightly. They should not. Under your head contract you are responsible for the whole of the works and for everyone you bring on site, so the principal will not chase your subcontractor — it will come to you, and so will the asset owner and the neighbour.

  • Notify your own insurer as well as requiring the subcontractor to notify theirs. Do not wait to see whether their policy responds. Your obligation runs on your clock.
  • Produce the certificate of currency — the one collected before they started and the one collected when the last expired. With only the first, you may find their cover lapsed in between.
  • Check what it says. A certificate confirms a policy existed. It does not confirm the limit is adequate, the activity is covered, or the excess is affordable to them.
  • Expect subrogation. Where your insurer pays and your subcontractor was at fault, your insurer will pursue recovery — and that recovery affects your own record.
  • Read your subcontract — the indemnity, the insurance obligations, and the flow-down of head contract notice provisions.

When the subcontractor is uninsured, underinsured, or their policy does not respond, the loss lands on you. Your policy answers your liability, your excess applies, and the claim goes on your record for someone else’s mistake. The only control is exercised before they mobilise: collect the certificate, diarise its expiry, and let nobody start work without a current one.

On larger jobs the principal may arrange contract works and liability cover for the project. Find out before you start whether you are a named insured or merely a beneficiary of a waiver, whose excess applies, and what sits outside it — plant and equipment frequently do. A project policy removes neither your obligation to hold your own cover nor your obligation to notify your own insurer. Where you are the subcontractor rather than the head contractor all of this runs in reverse, as covered in subcontracting to Tier 1 civil contractors.

What a claim costs you at renewal

A claim is not a closed transaction that ends when the cheque clears. It is an entry on a record that prices your business for years. Underwriters price forward from what you have already done, and your claims history is the largest single driver of what you pay next year and, past a certain point, of whether particular cover stays available at all. Nothing else you can influence moves the number as much. It also follows the business: a buyer running due diligence will ask for the claims history, and a poor one discounts the price — see our guide to buying, selling or succeeding a civil contracting business.

What an underwriter is actually reading

  • Frequency before severity. Several modest claims read as a systems problem; one large loss reads as an event. The first prices worse — the opposite of what most contractors expect.
  • Open claims and their reserves. An open claim is priced at its reserve, not at what you think it will settle for. A stale reserve on a claim finished in substance costs you every renewal it stays open.
  • The pattern. Three service strikes in three years is a conversation about your excavation controls. One flood is a conversation about the weather.
  • Loss ratio over several years — what the account has cost the market relative to what it has paid in.
  • Notifications that closed with no payment. Visible, and far less damaging than an unnotified circumstance surfacing after the policy expired.
  • What changed afterwards. The one item you fully control, and the one most contractors leave blank.

The consequences arrive in a predictable order of severity: a higher premium; a higher standard excess; an excess imposed specifically on the peril you keep hitting, commonly underground services; a restriction or exclusion on the activity that produced the claims; cover offered only on condition that specified controls are evidenced; and finally declinature by mainstream insurers and placement in a narrower market at materially worse terms.

The restriction has particular teeth for a tendering business. A tender may require public liability cover for the activities in the scope, and an exclusion added quietly at renewal can leave you unable to satisfy that requirement — which you will discover during a tender rather than at renewal. Read the endorsements on your renewal schedule against the insurance conditions in the contracts you bid, using the framework in insurance requirements for government civil tenders.

What to do about it, starting the day after

  • Document a corrective action — root cause, the change made, the date implemented, evidence it is being followed. The most persuasive document you can put in front of an underwriter, and it has to be real.
  • Chase closure of finished claims. Ask your broker quarterly which claims are open and what reserves they carry, and supply whatever lets the adjuster close the file.
  • Prepare a renewal submission rather than answering a questionnaire. An underwriter reading a controlled narrative prices differently from one reading a bare loss run.
  • Give your broker time. A renewal presented in the last week before expiry is priced defensively, because nobody has time to test the market.
  • Keep your own claims register, so a prequalification question about several years of incident history is answered accurately in an afternoon.
  • Connect it to your safety data. An incident that was also a notifiable WHS event shows up in your safety statistics, and those drive prequalification.

Which is the real argument for handling incidents properly. The claim itself is usually survivable. What is expensive is a business that cannot explain what happened, cannot show what it changed, and arrives at renewal with an open file and a story that keeps changing. Making an insurance claim well is not a legal skill. It is the same administrative discipline that wins tenders and gets variations paid, applied on the worst day of the year.

Checklist

  • Does your incident procedure put “make safe” first and “preserve the evidence” second, in writing?
  • Does everyone with authority on site know not to admit liability, agree a cost, or start remediation that destroys the scene?
  • Do you know what your policies say about how and when notice must be given — and does anyone other than the owner know?
  • Do you keep an incident register with a column for every notice that might be required, and the date each was sent?
  • On your last incident, can you show you treated the contractual notice and the insurance notice as two separate obligations?
  • For any excavation, can you produce the referral response, asset owner conditions and proving records within the hour?
  • Have you carried out and retained a dilapidation survey for every structure you are working adjacent to?
  • Are your subcontractors’ certificates of currency current, diarised, and checked against the work they are doing?
  • Have you agreed with your broker, in advance, the threshold at which you claim rather than simply notify?
  • Do you know which of your claims are still open, and what reserve each is carrying?
  • For every claim in the last few years, can you produce a documented corrective action?
  • Have you checked your renewal endorsements against the insurance requirements in the contracts you are bidding?

The short version

  • Make safe first, then preserve. Do not admit liability, agree a cost, or remediate before the scene is recorded.
  • Late notice is the commonest way cover is lost. The statutory protection reduces the loss; it does not remove it.
  • Notify on suspicion. On claims-made policies, notifying a circumstance in the right year is what preserves the cover.
  • Two clocks run at once — contractual notice and insurance notice. Satisfying one does not satisfy the other.
  • The evidence that decides the claim was created before the incident: diaries, dockets, locate records, SWMS, dilapidation surveys.
  • You may choose not to claim. You should almost never choose not to notify.
  • Do not categorise the loss yourself. Notify everything that might respond and let the broker sort out which policy answers.
  • A declined claim has a path: written reasons, internal dispute resolution, then AFCA.
  • Your claims history prices the business for years, and open reserves cost you every renewal they stay open.

Sources and further reading

This guide is general information for Australian civil construction businesses and is not legal, financial or insurance advice. The wording of your policy governs — notification requirements, conditions, exclusions, excesses and dispute rights differ between policies, between insurers and between jurisdictions, and nothing here overrides what your own wording says. Whether a statutory protection assists you, whether an exclusion applies, and whether a late notification has prejudiced an insurer depend on the specific facts and the specific wording. Incident notification duties under work health and safety, environmental and electrical safety legislation differ in every state and territory. Always work from your policy documents, your executed contract, the asset owner’s conditions, and current advice from your broker and a lawyer experienced in construction insurance.

  • The Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth), for the statutory framework in sections 2 and 3 — the provision limiting an insurer’s ability to refuse a claim by reason only of an act or omission of the insured occurring after the contract was entered into, where liability is instead reduced to the extent of the prejudice suffered; and the provision preserving cover under claims-made policies where the insured gives written notice of facts that might give rise to a claim before cover expires. Australian courts have considered both extensively, particularly the particularity a notification of circumstances must have.
  • The General Insurance Code of Practice, published by the Insurance Council of Australia, for the claims handling standards and timeframes in section 6. Subscribed to by most Australian general insurers, with compliance monitored by an independent Code Governance Committee and code monitoring services provided by a separately operated business unit of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority. The Code has been through a rewrite and public consultation, so confirm which version applies to your policy.
  • The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s regulatory guidance on internal dispute resolution, which sets the standards financial firms including general insurers must meet when handling complaints, and identifies declined insurance claims and disputes about the value of a claim as matters requiring a written response. Referenced in section 12.
  • The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the external dispute resolution scheme for complaints by consumers and small businesses about financial firms, including general insurance complaints about denied claims, the value of an assessed loss and delays in decision-making. Free to complainants, with determinations binding the financial firm where the complainant accepts them. Eligibility criteria, monetary limits and compensation caps apply, are revised periodically, and should be checked with AFCA directly.
  • Before You Dig Australia (BYDA), the national referral service formed when the former state-based Dial Before You Dig entities merged into a single national organisation, referenced in sections 8 and 10. Registered asset owners each respond with their own plans and their own conditions for working near their assets — validity periods, locating requirements, no-go zones and permitted excavation methods — and those conditions are the standard against which a service strike is assessed.
  • Work health and safety, environmental protection and electrical safety legislation in each state and territory, for the notification duties in section 5; categories, timeframes, site preservation obligations and the receiving regulator differ by jurisdiction and are not interchangeable. Related TenderBuilt guides behind the records described here: contract administration for civil SMEs, WHS management plans and SWMS, extension of time and delay claims, and insurance requirements for government civil tenders.

Writing a tender? Let’s write it together.

HoursMon–Fri 7am–5pm AEST